your case is initiating closure child supportwhy was caulerpa selectively bred in germany

Updated January, 2023

When opening the .pdf form from a web-browser such as Firefox, Microsoft Edge, or Chrome: download the form - right click on the link and select save link as and save it to your computer; open the file - right click on the file and choose open with Adobe . The case worker will send the closure request to the Responding State via CSENet or regular mail. Comment: Two commenters objected to what they perceived to be a subjective standard in paragraph (b)(12) under which the responding State is authorized to close an interstate case when it documents a failure on the part of the initiating State to take an action which is essential for the next step in providing services. Click Resolve beside each step. Donna E. Shalala, States should keep in mind, however, that case closure is permissive, not mandatory. (e) The IV-D agency must retain all records for cases closed in accordance with this section for a minimum of 3 years, in accordance with 45 CFR 75.361 . regulations, and opportunities for improvement. The proposed rule clarifies the situations in which States may close child support cases and makes other technical changes. 4. wage withholding). Assistant Secretary for Children and Families. Response: Yes, it is appropriate to provide the 60 calendar day time frame in instances where the letter sent to the recipient of services is returned marked "moved, left no forwarding address.'' Response: Federal regulations at 302.33(a)(4) require the IV-D agency, as part of the continuation of services for former assistance recipients, to notify the former AFDC family of their rights and responsibilities under the IV-D program, similar to the explanation given to applicants for IV-D services. Comment: One commenter objected to the criterion of (b)(10) on the basis that this would allow the States to close many "workable'' cases. 651 through 658, 660, 663, 664, 666, 667, 1302, 1396a(a)(25), 1396(d)(2), 1396b(o), 1396b(p), and 1396(k). These commenters were concerned that, in the event the identity of the biological father remained unknown following the IV-D interview of the recipient of services, the recipient of services would be determined to be not cooperating with the State IV-D agency for purposes of TANF eligibility. Court Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the court clerk, the case will be scheduled for a court hearing. 2. While it is true that, as of the date of this final rule, not all States have certified statewide automated systems in place, States do have automated locate systems capability and the majority of States have Statewide systems mandated by section 454(16) of the Social Security Act. The courthouse is located at 600 S. Commonwealth Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betsy Matheson, Director, Division for Policy and Planning, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 202-401-9386. Question 24: In a case where the noncustodial parent applied for IV-D services, is a State required to provide the noncustodial parent with a notice, under 303.11(c), that the custodial parent has requested that the case be closed? Default: An action that is automatically taken when someone does not respond to legal papers or show up to court as expected. In some states, the complainant may also be referred to as the "petitioner." . However, for clarity and consistency with terminology used in paragraph (b)(3)(iv), we have replaced "regular attempts'' with "diligent efforts'', and added a cross reference to locate regulations at 45 CFR 303.3. The responding State may close its case file only after the initiating State, or the State where the noncustodial parent is located, acknowledges that it has received the transferred case file from the responding State. Exactly when a case closes depends on the specific child support order, the laws that control it, and the case circumstances. Golden, Person Receiving Support (PRS): Parent or legal caretaker who the child lives with most of the time. 2. Traditionally, interstate case processing goes from a IV-AD agency in one State to a IV-AD agency in another State, which then forwards a withholding order to an employer in its State. Comment: One commenter raised the concern that the NPRM's proposed revisions to the case closure regulation would result in the closure of many cases that should not be closed. In other words, when the IV-D agency is unable to contact the non-IV-A recipient of services during a 60 calendar day period, the IV-D agency may not automatically close that case without first complying with the requirement in paragraph (c) by providing the recipient of services 60 calendar days to respond to a written notice of the State's intent to close the case. Response: Yes. Question 3: May the IV-D agency close a case, with an order already established, in which the noncustodial parent is unemployed and has no other income or attachable assets? The final rule permits the responding State to close the case if it is unable to process the case due to lack of cooperation by the initiating State. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No. Prosecutor's Office may cancel the case closure process in the statewide child support system. The Child Support Enforcement program was established under Title IV-D by the Social Services Amendments of 1974, for the purpose of establishing paternity and child support obligations, and enforcing support owed by noncustodial parents. * * * * *, (c) In cases meeting the criteria in paragraphs (b) (1) through (6) and (10) through (12) of this section, the State must notify the recipient of services, or in an interstate case meeting the criteria for closure under (b)(12), the initiating State, in writing 60 calendar days prior to closure of the case of the State's intent to close the case. 5. As stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, although OCSE is revising this regulation to provide the States with additional flexibility to manage their IV-D caseloads, we are aware of the necessity to balance this flexibility against the program's mission to ensure that the public receives needed child support enforcement services. ATTACHMENT: Attached is a final ruleVisit disclaimer page(PDF), published in the Federal Register March 10, 1999 (64 FR 11810) revising Federal regulations outlining criteria for closing child support enforcement cases, in response to the Presidents Memorandum of March 4, 1995, to reduce or eliminate mandated burdens on States, other governmental agencies or the private section. At the request of the States, OCSE originally promulgated regulations in 1989 which established criteria for States to follow in determining whether and how to close child support cases. In order for a case to be eligible for closure under this authority there are three requirements. For this reason, the case must remain open unless the family instructs the IV-D agency that it no longer desires services. Finally, there must be insufficient information concerning this noncustodial parent to perform an automated locate search. These are the individuals to whom the IV-D agency is required to send the child support collection. 3. Notification to the custodial parent that the custodial parent may be required to reimburse the IV-D agency for any misdirected child support collections received by the custodial parent could be included in the notice to the family regarding continuation of IV-D services. Should the recipient of services provide additional information that allows the State IV-D agency to locate the noncustodial parent, the case will remain open. In response to these comments, we promulgated 303.11(b)(12) which allows closure for non-cooperation in non-AFDC cases when the case file documents the circumstances of the non-cooperation, and an action by the custodial parent is essential for the next step in providing services. 6. (1) There is no longer a current support order and arrearages are under $500 or unenforceable under State law; 2. Response: As we stated in OCSE-PIQ-91-02, when a former AFDC recipient refuses continued IV-D services, the case would remain open as an AFDC arrears-only IV-D case, for purposes of collecting any arrearages due under a court or administrative order which are assigned to the State. Case Closure Matrix How It Works 1. In the final Program Standards regulations dated August 4, 1989 (54 FR 32284), and issued in OCSE-AT-89-15, we gave examples of appropriate instances in which to close cases. lacounty.gov     Customer Contact Center (866) 901-3212     ADA Assistance. Question 27: If States have to send the notice of intent to close the case to the custodial parent's last known address, what should be done if the family is homeless, and the only address on record with the IV-A and the IV-D agency is the address of the IV-A agency? [ 81 FR 93564, Dec. 20, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 35207, June 9, 2020] Approved: November 30, 1998. Response: The State is obligated under the Title IV-D program to provide child support enforcement services to eligible families. As we stated in OCSE-PIQ-90-08, the IV-D agency still would be required, as specified under 303.11(c), to notify the custodial parent in writing 60 calendar days prior to closure of the State's intent to close the case. Although it is true that PRWORA provides expansive new locate resources to the IV-D community, the fact remains that you must have sufficient identifying information concerning the individual you are trying to locate in order to take advantage of these new locate tools. Get the latest versions of Adobe Acrobat Reader from the Downloads and Plug-ins page. III-VII.These sections offer examples of case closure involving IV-D cases on behalf of AFDC recipients, former AFDC recipients, non-AFDC Medicaid recipients, Title IV-E foster care recipients, and non-AFDC applicants for IV-D services, respectively. When the initiating jurisdiction receives the intent to close notice for this case closure Update the Initiating State with the closure via CSENet ( Appendix 11.E - CSENet States) or hard copy. Response: There is no residency requirement for IV-D services, so the IV-D agency must continue to provide services. PRS: Person Receiving Support Parent or legal caretaker who the child lives with most of the time. Response: As we stated in OCSE-PIQ-89-05, the IV-D agency must provide IV-D services to any individual who applies for services, regardless of whether the custodial parent wishes to have the IV-D agency assist in obtaining support, as long as the provision of services is in the best interests of the child. In light of these considerations, this recommendation was not adopted. Both commenters recommended that a reference to "other exceptions'' be included in paragraph (b)(9) when the final rule was issued. Question 6: What should a responding State do if the noncustodial parent is found to be living in another State? In short, it means that the mother is not cooperating with the Dept. If there are arrears owed to the State, CSSD will leave the case open and continue to enforce those arrears, but will stop enforcing current support and arrears owed to the PRS.

Barclays Mindset Assessment, Anna Madeley Is She Married, 18th Airborne Corps Deputy Commanding General,